wasif twm case law Fundamentals Explained
wasif twm case law Fundamentals Explained
Blog Article
Just a few years ago, searching for case precedent was a complicated and time consuming job, demanding men and women to search through print copies of case legislation, or to purchase access to commercial online databases. Today, the internet has opened up a bunch of case regulation search opportunities, and many sources offer free access to case regulation.
“The evidence regarding wajtakkar and extra-judicial confession being relied upon via the prosecution against the petitioner and his higher than mentioned co-accused namely Hussain Bakhsh has already been opined from the Lahore High Court, Lahore in its order dated 2-twelve-2010 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No.
4. It's been noticed by this Court that there can be a delay of one day in the registration of FIR which has not been explained because of the complainant. Moreover, there is not any eye-witness of the alleged prevalence and also the prosecution is relying on the witnesses of extra judicial confession. The evidence of extra judicial confession of the petitioners has long been tendered by Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram through their statements recorded under Section 161, Cr.P.C., on 06.02.2018. Both of them namely Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram occurred to become the real brothers from the deceased but they didn't react in any respect towards the confessional statements of the petitioners and calmly observed them leaving, a single after the other, without even moving an inch. They have not mentioned in their statements that the accused held some weapon when they visited them to confess their guilt about the murder of Ghulam Farid which could have precluded these witnesses from apprehending the petitioners. Their conduct does not glimpse much inspiring or natural. The petitioner, namely, Mst. Mubeena Bibi was arrested on fourteen.02.2018 and there isn't any explanation as to why her arrest was not effected after making of your alleged extra judicial confession. It has been held on numerous occasions that extra judicial confession of the accused is often a weak kind of evidence which might be manoeuvred because of the prosecution in almost any case where direct connecting evidence does not occur their way. The prosecution is usually counting on the evidence of Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal which is equally fragile, as both the witnesses Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal did not say a word regarding presence of some light with the place, where they allegedly observed the petitioners jointly on the motorcycle at four.
Section 302 in the Pakistan Penal Code addresses the grave offense of intentional murder and prescribes severe punishments to act as a deterrent and copyright the value of human life. The application of your death penalty or life imprisonment depends to the specifics of every case, including any extenuating circumstances or mitigating factors.
The court system is then tasked with interpreting the legislation when it is unclear how it applies to any given situation, typically rendering judgments based over the intent of lawmakers as well as the circumstances of the case at hand. These types of decisions become a guide for long run similar cases.
In this blog site post, we will delve into the details of Section 302 PPC, Checking out its provisions and the gravity of its punishment.
seventy three . Const. P. 288/2024 (D.B.) Engro Fertilizers Limited through Asad Shakil Khan V/S Full Bench of NIRC & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur Pertaining to the second issue of non-service of grievance notice. Under Section 33 in the Industrial Relations Ac1,2012 (lRA 2012), ifa grievance notice will not be served, the grievance petition can be dismissed. This is because service of the grievance notice can be a mandatory need as well as a precondition for filing a grievance petition. The regulation requires that a grievance notice be served within the employer before filing a grievance petition. This allows the employer to reply to the grievance and attempt to resolve it amicably. In case the employer fails to reply or resolve the grievance, the employee can then file a grievance petition with the National Industrial Relations Commission CNIRC) In the event the organization is transprovincial.
6. Mere involvement inside of a heinous offence is no ground for refusing bail to an accused who otherwise becomes entitled for your concession of bail. The petitioner namely Bhoora was arrested in this case on 08.05.2018, due more info to the fact then he is driving the bars, He's previous non-convict, never involved in any case, investigation qua him is complete, his person is no more essential for further investigation, therefore, his constant incarceration would not serve any helpful purpose at this stage.
The prosecution presented substantial evidence, which include eyewitness testimonies and expert forensic analysis, confirming the copyright nature of your seized currency.
This public interest litigation came before the Supreme Court of Pakistan when petitioners challenged the construction of a close-by electricity grid station due to probable health risks and hazards.
Case legislation, also known as precedent, forms the foundation in the Pakistani legal system. Understanding relevant judgments and rulings is very important for interpreting statutes and predicting legal results. Free access to these resources democratizes legal knowledge, empowering citizens and marketing transparency.
Article 199 of the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other ample remedy is provided by regulation." It is well-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust available remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether those remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
A coalition of residents sent a letter of petition towards the Supreme Court to challenge the Water and Power Enhancement Authority’s (WAPDA) construction of an electricity grid station in their community, on designated “green belt” property. The Court heard the matter as being a human rights case, as Article 184 (3) of the Pakistan Constitution presents initial jurisdiction for the Supreme Court to just take up and determine any matter concerning the enforcement of fundamental rights of public importance.
The residents argued that the high-voltage grid station would pose a health risk and prospective hazard to local residents. Ultimately, the court determined the scientific evidence inconclusive, whilst observing the general development supports that electromagnetic fields have detrimental effects on human health. The Court accepted the petitioner’s argument that it should adopt the precautionary principle set out in the 1992 Rio Declaration to the Environment and Advancement, the first international instrument that linked environment protection with human rights, whereby the lack of full scientific certainty should not be used for a reason to prevent environmental degradation.